Upanishads: a summation, by S.K. Balasubramanian

The Upanishads present an entirely refreshing manner of discussing supra-human reality.  They affirm that such an entity is a Reality, known as Brahman and that humans are a part of it. The Gods, not merely the Hindu ones, are no more than imaginary cult heads. Evolution, not vested interests, political compulsions or delusions, controls and guides human development.
The Hindu paradigm is set by the axiom given in the Mundaka Upanishad, Satyameva jayate naanrtam, which means,“ Reality prevails over delusions.” Only the ones without delusions may ‘see’ the reality. The abhyaaroha mantra of the Brihadaarnayaka Upanishad is based on this conviction. It says,

“Lead thou me

From the unreal to the Real

From ignorance to Enlightenment

From the ephemeral to the Eternal.”

The same Upanishad looks upon Brahman as infinity, completely self-contained. It cannot be added to or subtracted from.

Delusions are of several types. The most common ones relate to God. Kena Upanishad denies any comfort to those who assert that God is in their pocket. It says that it (God) is unknown to the ‘knower’. The ones who claim to know god do not know it. Tejabindhu Upanishad says that Brahman is beyond ideation. That God is unknowable by the human mind is affirmed by the Brihadaaranyaka Upanishad. It defines the Reality as indefinable. It asserts “Neti, Neti’ ‘not this, not this’. Brahman is not to be limited by definitions.

Brahman is not to be confined to books. Amrita Bindu Upanishad says, “Master all the texts but (in the search for Brahman) give up all of them completely like the one gleaning for grains rejects the chaff.” I take it to mean that information is not ‘knowledge’. What is contained in books is information. Knowledge has a certain ageless pristine quality that is more to be comprehended than learnt.

But information, looked upon as ‘lower knowledge’, has its value. Isha Upanishad accepts its importance in worldly life. It says, “Live according to the ‘lower’ knowledge and transcend it to acquire higher knowledge that alone gives insight into the Eternal.”

Worldly knowledge is an essential stepping-stone to the higher one. It is implied that the worldly knowledge should not be ignored. Spirituality does not stand alone. It has relevance only in the context of worldly life. One should be a whole or complete human being in the world before he aspires for the next world. Moksha is an evolutionary end product not the first or any other stage in life.

The Gita goes further. It recommends that ‘attachment’ should be given up as the fist step. Attachment is an emotional or ideological locus. The spiritual aspirant should renounce intuitively the limiting loci and the concurrent existential constraints by remaining objective. One could say, “Objectivity is the operative word of Vedanta.” Even this statement is a simplification.

Evolution is the heart of the Hindu approach. Taittiriya Upanishad details primordial evolution and postulates another stage not known so far. The Upanishad calls that stage, “Bliss”. That is perhaps for individuals like Bhrigu, the son of Varuna, to attain. There is no collective salvation. Sophistry does not lead there. Emphatically the Upanishad says, “Words are echoed back without any impact. So also is intelligence ineffective.” Bliss is an intuitive level.

Brahman is seamless continuity. It is intuitive Reality. It is pristine. It is pure.

Taittiriya Upanishad asserts Brahman is Satyam Gnyaanam Anantam, “Reality, Consciousness and Infinity.” This aspect of Brahman is attested to in other Upanishads.

The same Upanishad gives the logo of Hinduism, OM. “OM is Brahman,” it declares. “OM is everything.” OM has five limbs.

Cosmic consciousness is postulated, in Maandookya Upanishad, as a fourth state of consciousness extending beyond the wakeful and the two dream states. It is known as Turiya.

Cosmic consciousness is again the subject of the Aitareya Upanishad that says, “Brahman is cosmic consciousness”.

Energy is another constituent of Brahman. It is called Vaayu. Prasna Upanishad and the Shanti Patha of Taittiriya Upanishad assert this fact. The latter addresses Vaayu, “You are the Real Brahman. I accept this (as fact).” Brahmopanishad acknowledges this. It equates praana, energy in the context of the human body, as Brahman.

Light or Jyoti is another form of energy. It is the universal vector that determines Time. Both are irreversible.

Taittiriya Upanishad speaks of yet another component of Brahman: the Aakaasha or Space. It is on Space that everything rests.

Brahman is a five-component (Paanktam) composite of three-dimensional Space, Energy and Light or Time.

Kathopanishad is more mundane. It presents death not as a terminus but as another transit point on the road to Brahman. It takes us for a ride in a chariot that is the human body. The charioteer is the mind. The horses are the sense organs. If the horses are under control one reaches the destination. Otherwise it is a disastrous journey. “The path to Realization is like the razor’s edge.”

All this is not empty rhetoric. Taittiriya Upanishad gives the advice, “When in doubt consult qualified Brahmins of great learning and a high degree of objectivity. They should not be corrupt. They should be practical and interested in social consolidation and advance. They should have a stake in dharma with no personal agenda.” Hindu society had produced many such individuals. I mention two: Vidhyaaranya who inspired the Vijayanagar empire and Samarth Ramdas, the Guru of Shivaji.

Email This Post Email This Post

 

3 Responses to “Upanishads: a summation, by S.K. Balasubramanian”

Leave a Reply