Comments on: Spoken Sanskrit-Lesson 7, by Anuradha Choudry http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/ Hindu Magazine for Youth Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:42:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Sankar http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17761 Sankar Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:19:38 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17761 The lessons are superb. Could somebody translate the following sentences in sanskrit please ? 1. He should have seen the doctor. ( Inference - He has not seen the doctor) 2.He had to see the doctor. ( Meaning - He had seen the doctor out of necessity) The lessons are superb. Could somebody translate the following sentences in sanskrit please ?
1. He should have seen the doctor. ( Inference - He has not seen the doctor)
2.He had to see the doctor. ( Meaning - He had seen the doctor out of necessity)

]]> By: K G http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17695 K G Mon, 30 May 2011 04:41:40 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17695 http://www.facebook.com/notes/krishna-g-misra/sanskrit/191100430915780 Sanskrit is not a language it is voice of natural sound. Cow in USA and in India would have no difference because it is Sanskrit. Indian child and German child cry same way and it is independent of time and space. In Bikaner, one lady from tribal village, sang a song in a typical voice which penetrated in our heart. I asked them if they were illiterate, they replied in 'yes'. That tribe never learnt writing nor they can read anything, nor even Rupee note. As a return, they have finest memory, and precise voice of sound transpoted by listening tradition from ages and are survivors of desert in display of highest liberation over laws of nature. They seek no Nobel prize, nor a post in Parliament, but care for laws of nature, and family and knowledge in voice of sound. Sanskrit grew itself like that. Veda or other voices were remembered by sages with great precision, and this required knowledge of discipline (called Chhand) of sound with search of Truth as aim, and it therefore, had no load on memory. Laws of nature would remind the verses and it is how our scripture got into such a depth of mind. On principle, ‘Sanskrit’ is never writable in words or style, it has no chance of variation or error in reproducing same sound. For example, one written word is pronounced differently, and that new pronunciation makes it a new word in writing, and this way one natural language becomes many languages by compounding of writing-pronunciation errors. So many languages are echo of voice of only one natural sound, and we now need a separate definition to explain it what is actually natural and would have not needed learning from other sources. http://www.facebook.com/notes/krishna-g-misra/sanskrit/191100430915780

Sanskrit is not a language it is voice of natural sound. Cow in USA and in India would have no difference because it is Sanskrit. Indian child and German child cry same way and it is independent of time and space.

In Bikaner, one lady from tribal village, sang a song in a typical voice which penetrated in our heart. I asked them if they were illiterate, they replied in ‘yes’. That tribe never learnt writing nor they can read anything, nor even Rupee note. As a return, they have finest memory, and precise voice of sound transpoted by listening tradition from ages and are survivors of desert in display of highest liberation over laws of nature. They seek no Nobel prize, nor a post in Parliament, but care for laws of nature, and family and knowledge in voice of sound. Sanskrit grew itself like that.
Veda or other voices were remembered by sages with great precision, and this required knowledge of discipline (called Chhand) of sound with search of Truth as aim, and it therefore, had no load on memory. Laws of nature would remind the verses and it is how our scripture got into such a depth of mind.

On principle, ‘Sanskrit’ is never writable in words or style, it has no chance of variation or error in reproducing same sound. For example, one written word is pronounced differently, and that new pronunciation makes it a new word in writing, and this way one natural language becomes many languages by compounding of writing-pronunciation errors.

So many languages are echo of voice of only one natural sound, and we now need a separate definition to explain it what is actually natural and would have not needed learning from other sources.

]]> By: K G http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17696 K G Mon, 30 May 2011 04:41:40 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17696 http://www.facebook.com/notes/krishna-g-misra/sanskrit/191100430915780 Sanskrit is not a language it is voice of natural sound. Cow in USA and in India would have no difference because it is Sanskrit. Indian child and German child cry same way and it is independent of time and space. In Bikaner, one lady from tribal village, sang a song in a typical voice which penetrated in our heart. I asked them if they were illiterate, they replied in 'yes'. That tribe never learnt writing nor they can read anything, nor even Rupee note. As a return, they have finest memory, and precise voice of sound transpoted by listening tradition from ages and are survivors of desert in display of highest liberation over laws of nature. They seek no Nobel prize, nor a post in Parliament, but care for laws of nature, and family and knowledge in voice of sound. Sanskrit grew itself like that. Veda or other voices were remembered by sages with great precision, and this required knowledge of discipline (called Chhand) of sound with search of Truth as aim, and it therefore, had no load on memory. Laws of nature would remind the verses and it is how our scripture got into such a depth of mind. On principle, ‘Sanskrit’ is never writable in words or style, it has no chance of variation or error in reproducing same sound. For example, one written word is pronounced differently, and that new pronunciation makes it a new word in writing, and this way one natural language becomes many languages by compounding of writing-pronunciation errors. So many languages are echo of voice of only one natural sound, and we now need a separate definition to explain it what is actually natural and would have not needed learning from other sources. http://www.facebook.com/notes/krishna-g-misra/sanskrit/191100430915780

Sanskrit is not a language it is voice of natural sound. Cow in USA and in India would have no difference because it is Sanskrit. Indian child and German child cry same way and it is independent of time and space.

In Bikaner, one lady from tribal village, sang a song in a typical voice which penetrated in our heart. I asked them if they were illiterate, they replied in ‘yes’. That tribe never learnt writing nor they can read anything, nor even Rupee note. As a return, they have finest memory, and precise voice of sound transpoted by listening tradition from ages and are survivors of desert in display of highest liberation over laws of nature. They seek no Nobel prize, nor a post in Parliament, but care for laws of nature, and family and knowledge in voice of sound. Sanskrit grew itself like that.
Veda or other voices were remembered by sages with great precision, and this required knowledge of discipline (called Chhand) of sound with search of Truth as aim, and it therefore, had no load on memory. Laws of nature would remind the verses and it is how our scripture got into such a depth of mind.

On principle, ‘Sanskrit’ is never writable in words or style, it has no chance of variation or error in reproducing same sound. For example, one written word is pronounced differently, and that new pronunciation makes it a new word in writing, and this way one natural language becomes many languages by compounding of writing-pronunciation errors.

So many languages are echo of voice of only one natural sound, and we now need a separate definition to explain it what is actually natural and would have not needed learning from other sources.

]]> By: K G http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17694 K G Mon, 30 May 2011 04:25:59 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17694 Sanskrit is not a language it is voice of natural sound. Cow in USA and in India would have no difference because it is Sanskrit. Indian child and German child cry same way. Because 'Sanskrit' is never writable in words or style, it has no chance of variation or error in reproducing same sound. For example, one written word is pronounced differently, and that new pronunciation makes it a new word in writing, and this way one natural language becomes many languages by compounding of writing-pronunciation errors. So many languages are echo of voice of only one natural sound, and we now need a separate definition to explain it what is actually natural and would have not needed learning from other sources. Sanskrit is not a language it is voice of natural sound. Cow in USA and in India would have no difference because it is Sanskrit. Indian child and German child cry same way. Because ‘Sanskrit’ is never writable in words or style, it has no chance of variation or error in reproducing same sound. For example, one written word is pronounced differently, and that new pronunciation makes it a new word in writing, and this way one natural language becomes many languages by compounding of writing-pronunciation errors.
So many languages are echo of voice of only one natural sound, and we now need a separate definition to explain it what is actually natural and would have not needed learning from other sources.

]]> By: Daniel Tkach http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17679 Daniel Tkach Sun, 15 May 2011 19:50:19 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17679 Wonderful!! Please post more lessons!!!! धन्यवदः Wonderful!! Please post more lessons!!!!
धन्यवदः

]]> By: sreeja bhaskar http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17648 sreeja bhaskar Tue, 03 May 2011 05:50:49 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17648 i want sanskrit script instead of english .if you can publish some usaful conversational sentence. thanku. i want sanskrit script instead of english .if you can publish some usaful
conversational sentence. thanku.

]]> By: sreeja bhaskar http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17647 sreeja bhaskar Tue, 03 May 2011 05:47:37 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17647 i want sanskrit script instead of english i want sanskrit script instead of english

]]> By: A.Balakrishnani http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17623 A.Balakrishnani Sun, 24 Apr 2011 14:50:15 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17623 Sanskrit is a boon for us. Where the books for spoken sanskrit is available and can learn more and easily Sanskrit is a boon for us. Where the books for spoken sanskrit is available and can learn more and easily

]]> By: Mukund Jha http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17393 Mukund Jha Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:52:43 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-17393 Dear A.K. Sharma. Please contact me on ranjan.mukund@gmail.com..i have some links for learning sanskrit which I can share with you.. Regards, Mukund Dear A.K. Sharma. Please contact me on ranjan.mukund@gmail.com..i have some links for learning sanskrit which I can share with you..

Regards,
Mukund

]]> By: A.K. Sharma http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-16984 A.K. Sharma Sun, 16 Jan 2011 07:02:02 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-16984 Dear, Pt. Anuradha, I am a great enthusiast of spoken Sanskrit but unfortunately I couldn't find any resources on the web. Your lesson-7 is a ray of hope. Please, tell me any resource like e=book or a web-site where I can learn spoken Sanskrit.Please continue your blogs on spoken Sanskrit. Great job!!! Thanks in (advance) Dear,
Pt. Anuradha,
I am a great enthusiast of spoken Sanskrit but unfortunately I couldn’t find any resources on the web. Your lesson-7 is a ray of hope. Please, tell me any resource like e=book or a web-site where I can learn spoken Sanskrit.Please continue your blogs on spoken Sanskrit.

Great job!!!
Thanks in (advance)

]]> By: vivek http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-14559 vivek Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:52:37 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-14559 Dear Anuradha, Thanks for translation. It would be great to see such translation using Sanskrit and Hindi. In the end, we need to let people learn our own national language. Why do we need to go through english to get there...that is a shame...I see this too often Your thoughts... Regards, Vivek Dear Anuradha,

Thanks for translation. It would be great to see such translation using Sanskrit and Hindi. In the end, we need to let people learn our own national language. Why do we need to go through english to get there…that is a shame…I see this too often

Your thoughts…

Regards,

Vivek

]]> By: Bhagwat Shah http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-341 Bhagwat Shah Fri, 02 May 2008 17:13:15 +0000 http://www.hinduyuva.org/tattva-blog/2008/05/sanskrit-7/#comment-341 Excellent ! Excellent !

]]>