Government of India Denies Shri Rama’s Existence—Your Thoughts?

Most of us must have heard about the government of India’s statement on September 12, 2007, to the Supreme Court, claiming that there was no historical evidence to establish the existence of Lord Rama or the other characters in Ramayana. The affidavit was filed before the court by the Archaeological Survey of India, an Indian government agency. The affidavit declared that there is no “historical record” to prove the existence of the characters or the occurrences of the events depicted in the Ramayana. 

This event was naturally met with tremendous protest from Hindus around the world. In a country where the Ramayana is embedded in daily life and guides people’s thinking, choices, and decisions, the government denied the existence of Rama and Sita, essentially insulting an integral part of Hindu culture and of the nation’s identity. The government’s act hurt the sentiments of one billion Hindus across the globe, one-sixth of the world’s population.

Such a statement about Hinduism, especially by the Indian government itself, is a source of great debate. As Hindus, we are all directly affected by this. How do you feel about the government’s decision to make such claims about Shri Rama?

Email This Post Email This Post

 

3 Responses to “Government of India Denies Shri Rama’s Existence—Your Thoughts?”

Leave a Reply