Veer Savarkar, by Amar Mulay
The years of Indian slavery to the British brought forth some of the finest blood our country had to offer to the world. One such giant, shining like a sun amongst that kingly constellation of super-heroes, is Vinayak Damodar Savarkar—Veer Savarkar, as he is better known. Born in 1883 and fondly known as the crown prince of the Indian revolutionary movement, Savarkar was a prodigy. At the tender age of fourteen, he shut himself in his room and swore before the image of his family deity that he would never rest in peace until he had won India’s independence back from the oppressive British rule. Instead of playing games with his classmates, he preferred discussions with his uncles about the swords inherited from his family’s service with Peshwa rulers of Maharashtra.
An early indicator of his potential was his organization of his school friends into a group dedicated to striving towards India’s independence. Incredible as it may sound, a fourteen year old Savarkar learned to wield swords and knives, built stamina and strength by going on swims in the local river and treks in the nearby mountains, and composed poems and prayers dedicated to the motherland and her glory. By the time he graduated from high school, he already had a sizeable following among his friends who were now fully organized into what was the nucleus of the future revolutionary network with its arms throughout Europe and the Americas. Mitra Mela, the association of Savarkar’s high school friends, later became famous throughout the country as the cradle that spawned the revolutionary society Abhinav Bharat, the nightmare of the British secret police.
Attending Fergusson college in Pune, Savarkar quickly became notorious with the pro-British school authorities for his fiercely patriotic speeches on campus and for exhorting fellow students to boycott English goods. When he finally got expelled from his program because of his relentless pursuit of organizing the youth on campus into a revolutionary movement, students went on strike forcing the college authorities to withdraw their ruling. Back on campus, Savarkar’s activities continued with renewed vigor, drawing the attention of India’s biggest nationalist leader of that time, Lokmanya Tilak. Tilak was so impressed by the young Savarkar that he personally attended a procession organized by Abhinav Bharat and threw the first English-made cloth in the bonfire lit for the purpose. Tilak was so taken by Savarkar’s thoughts, words, and actions, that he wrote him a reference letter for the scholarship sponsored by the Indian nationalist Shyamji Krishna Verma for a law degree in London.
With Savarkar’s presence, India House, the house maintained by Verma for Indian students in London, quickly became the central hub of the Indian revolutionary movement. Students living there like Madanlal Dhingra, Pandurang Bapat, and V.V.S. Iyer, went on to become Abhinav Bharat activists and became part of history as martyrs and heroes who sacrificed potentially luxurious lives for lives in prisons and deaths on the gallows. In no time, Savarkar emerged as the coordinator of the nationalist non-resident Indian community in London with the likes of Madam Cama, Barrister Rana, and Shyamji Krisna Verma as his backers and supporters. Abhinav Bharat was by now a thriving revolutionary organization with members from the Irish Republican Army and Lenin’s revolutionary group in Russia assisting students at India House in manufacturing weapons and explosives. Indeed, Lenin himself paid a visit to Savarkar during the former’s visit to London. Pistols and revolutionary pamphlets started to get smuggled into India on a regular basis. British officers and bureaucrats who had taken sadistic pleasure in torturing the poor in India now started living in fear of their lives. Bullet shots reverberated across the world’s press heralding the renewal of martial Indian resistance to the slave masters from England.
A number of atrocious British imperialists fell to the revolutionary gun shots master-minded from London, stealing the sleep of the be-alls of the British Raj in India. Indeed, it was our nation’s misfortune that Veer Savarkar was arrested in London, more likely than not by a treacherous tip given to the British C.I.D. Sentenced to solitary confinement and hard labor in the Andaman islands, Savarkar, instead of wilting away, started a movement within the prison premises to re-convert Hindus who had been converted out of their Hindu faith by force and trickery. His most remarkable achievement was the compilation of a thesis, using nails on the wall of his prison cell, aimed at defining the term “Hindu”. His book, Hindutva, argued that Hinduness is a way of life and has cultural connotations rather than merely religious ones. This was the first systematic attempt at explaining what one means by calling oneself a “Hindu.” Savarkar had outgoing ex-prisoners commit to memory portions of Hindutva, and the book was thus smuggled out of his cell orally and published under a nom de plume even while its author was still in prison and forbidden the use of pen and paper. Such was the magnitude of this man’s powers and intellect.
For all his efforts though, Savarkar never really saw the fruition of the vision he had for our country’s future. He was back-stabbed by people he considered his colleagues and fellow nationalists. People who did not appreciate Savarkar’s ideas of achieving independence forsake him even when his entire family was dragged into the streets by the police and his family house sealed and confiscated by the British authorities. Ignored and shunned by the media and the powers that be, Savarkar remains a shrouded, misunderstood figure. Yet, he has a lot to teach us through the vast amount of literature that he has left behind. Indeed, Savarkar’s life deserves to be discovered and studied anew especially by the youth of our country. It is for us to look past the clouds of chicanery throttling the political theatre of our country today, heralding a new morning on a strong and prosperous India.
Amar Mulay is from Thane, Mumbai and is pursuing his Master’s Degree in Philosophy at Cal State Long Beach. He also teaches undergraduate Philosophy classes at Long Beach Community College.
Email This Post
October 28th, 2008 01:52
awesome raaaaaa!!!!!!
May 25th, 2009 11:21
wenever forget the contribution of this Immortal man.the only persone whogot the life time prisner twice in a one life.who can forget that he wasthe only persone whosays the war of 1857 was first independent war againest Britain.
June 24th, 2009 13:16
Veer Savarkar an every inch a Hindu Nationalist leader has said-
“I Shall Die As Hindu “
“After veer savarkar’s unconditional release form Ratanagiri on May10,1937 Many felicitation functions were held in his honour. Replying to one such address he said, “Resistance, cooperation and pressure are the ways by which we have to achieve freedom. The basis of this Swarajya would be Democracy, based on the principle of ‘one man one vote’. While attaining this goal I shall try my best to safeguard the just rights of Hindus. Whatever happens I shall never leave the side of the Hindus. Even a life of luxury I shall reject if it is against the interests of the Hindus. Rather, I shall prefer death as a Hindu.”
June 24th, 2009 13:18
The greatest Indian leader of his time VEER SAVARKAR has said-
In India Hindus are an overwhelming majority; India’s culture and civilization of the Hindus ;the history of India is the history of the rise and fall of the Hindus; so Hindus are the nation in India ; others are only communities living in this country.
-VEER SAVARKAR
June 24th, 2009 13:18
Veer Savarkar has rightly said-
What is the Hindu Nation?
“Let us get this thing straight. People have a wrong notion of a Hindu Nation and about communalism. A Hindu means a person who regards this land of Bharatvarsha from the Indus to the seas as his fatherland and holy land-the land of origin of his religion and the cradle of his faith.”
-SAVARKAR
June 24th, 2009 13:19
The Greatest patriot and freedom fighter of his times Veer Savarkar has said like this-
“Some people says they won freedom without shedding a single drop of blood. True, very much true! Not even a single drop of blood has stained their creased clothes. But can we forget thousands of those tender boys and daring youths who, for freedom’s sake, fell fighting in the pool of their own blood?”
-Veer Savarkar
June 24th, 2009 13:21
Veer Savarkar’s views on how India got freedom-
Factors for freedom
“There are many factors which contributed to the freedom of Bharat. It is wrong to imagine that Congress alone won independence for Hindustan. It is equally absurd to think that non-cooperation, Charkha and the 1942 ‘Quit India Movement’ were solely responsible for the withdrawal of the British Power from our country. There were other dynamic and compelling forces which finally determined the issue of freedom. First, Indian politics was carried to the Army on whom the British depended entirely to hold down Hindustan’ Second, there was a revolt of the Royal Indian Navy and a threat by the Air force; Third, the valiant role of Netaji Subash Bose and the I.N.A.; Four, The war of independence in 1857,which shook the British; five, the terrific sacrifices made by thousands of revolutionaries and patriots in the ranks of the congress, other groups and parties. So freedom came with blood, Sweat and tears of countless men and women of Hindustan.
-Veer Savarkar
June 24th, 2009 13:22
The great visionary Veer Savarker has once said-
“Those who think I am fanatic Hindu and a communalist are suffering from a strange malady hallucination. I am neither a fanatic Hindu nor a communalist. I cannot make donkeys think like horses.
“What I say today people accept after ten years. I am prepared to wait for ten years.”
-Veer Savarkar
June 24th, 2009 13:23
Hindu dharma, Hindu sanskrati aur bhartiye avam vishva – itihas ka mulgami aur sukham adhayan karne ke karan savarkar is natize per aye the ki manavta ke charam kallyan ke liye Hindu tatvagyan ki sharan lene ke siva koi dusra upaye nahi hai.
-sabhar :-savarkar smarak granth
August 4th, 2009 12:08
its good.actually awesomeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
August 22nd, 2009 05:59
Veer Savarkar, Gandhi Ji & R.S.S
vis -a- vis Partition of India
Many people ask as to how with such a vast majority of Hindus in India and powerful leaders like Veer Savarkar and Gandhi ji and a big organization like RSS, Hindus had conceded to the demand of Muslim League for partition of India without any battle or resistance worth the name.
To find out reasons for all this I have gone through books /articles written by some eminent writers like Shri J.D joglekar, Shri Vidya Sagar Anand, Prof. Vikram Ganesh Oak, Shri Bhagwan Saran Awasthi and Shri Gangadhar Indulkar. Thus my findings are based on their views and also on the basis of my own experience.
First of all I quote bellow the virtues and the qualities of the two leaders- Veer Savarkar and Gandhi ji, who were at the helm of affairs during the days of partition and also about the then leaders of RSS. Thereafter I will narrate the events that developed in the course of time resulting in the unfortunate and painful partition.
While Veer Savarkar was visionary genius, he breathed fiery heroism from his boyhood. Defiance of unjust authority was in his blood. He was every inch a Veer (hero) as much in action as in his thoughts. He and his family members made supreme sacrifices for the freedom of motherland from British yokes. He and his party Hindu Mahasabha though with small band of workers had strained every nerve to oppose and confront the direct action of Muslim League and its demand for division of India. He and his party organized a crusade to keep India united. Quite a large number of eminent Scholars in India and abroad have said that Savarkar’s views on Hindu Rastravaad as enunciated in his book “Hindutva” are not communal but are scientific and can save India from communalism, casteism, and regionalism. That Hindu Rastravaad .
2.
was adopted by the Hindu Mahasabha and also by the founders of the RSS as their party’s basic ideology. But the Congress has always been propagating that Veer Savarkar and Hindu Mahasabha are Communal. Even the RSS after 1940 started a campaign of vilification against Veer Savarkar and Hindu Mahasabha. So most of the people though admiring the unique and shining personality of Veer Savarkar, kept them away from Hindu Mahasabha.
On the other hands Gandhi ji was undoubtedly a leader of masses. For long period of 25 years he strived for independence of India. Although he was not even a primary member of the all India congress, he was the supremo of that party. He however, did not tolerate any person at the top of the party who held views different form that of Gandhi ji or could pose a threat to his supremacy e.g. Subash Chandra Bose was elected president of all India congress against the wishes of Gandhi ji but he had to resign because Gandhi ji and his disciples in the party did not corporate with Subash.
Gandhi ji was never a man of firm views e.g. At once stage while opposing the demand of Muslim league for partition of India he had said “vivisect me before vivisecting India”. How serious was he in his views, let his own words speak for him. Just a few months later in 1940 he wrote in his paper “the Muslims must have the same right of self determination that the rest of India have. We are at present a joint family and any member may claim a division”. Unfortunately in June 1947 Gandhi ji persuaded the members of all India Congress Committee to accept the demand of Muslim league for partition of India and creation of Pakistan. Thus when the formula for creation of Pakistan was endorsed by the Congress, Pakistan came into being.
For 28 long years, in spite of complete absence of Muslim response, Gandhi ji clung steadfastly to his favorite theory for Muslims. At one time Gandhi ji had suggested to the British to
3.
hand over power to the Muslims before quitting India. In a letter to Jinnah (Muslim league president) in 1942 Gandhi ji wrote that “he would have no objection to the British handing over power to the Muslim League on behalf of all Indians. The Congress would not only not oppose a government formed by Muslim League on behalf of all Indians but would even participate in it”. He said “he was saying this in all seriousness and sincerity”.
But the Muslim League insisted that it wanted Pakistan (a separate homeland for Muslims) and nothing less then that. The Muslim League was not cooperating in the freedom movement. It was pressing for a separate homeland for Muslims. The Muslim league was claiming that Hindus and Muslims have nothing in common and cannot live together peacefully. That Muslims are a separate nation and they want Pakistan for them. Muslim league had also asked the British not to quit India until India is partitioned and Pakistan a separate country is carved for Muslims. There were wide spread riots due to direct action of Muslim League in which thousands of Hindus were killed and women molested. But the Congress and Gandhi ji with their policy of appeasement and non-violence did not retaliate. This compelled Gandhi ji and Nehru ji to surrender to the demand for Pakistan and persuaded the Congress party leaders to accept the formula of partition of India and formation of Pakistan.
Profound gloom and hidous confusion prevailed through out the country (at partition time). The feelings within congress circles was exceedingly bitter. There was a sense of betrayal and underlying the disillusionment and almost over whelming frustration. Shree Purshtom Das Tondon, quondam president of the Indian National Congress was reported as saying “Gandhi’s doctrine of absolute nonviolence was responsible for the partition of India”. One congress newspaper said in a leading article. “Today Gandhi ji is a living witness to the failure of his mission”.
4.
As such Gandhi ji’s policy of appeasement of Muslims and its leader Mr. Jinnah and with no retaliation to their direct action plans, Gandhi ji and his Congress can be genuinely held responsible for partition of India.
That was in nutshell the state of affair of the two political parties namely Hindu Mahasabha under the leadership of Veer Savarkar and of Indian National Congress under the leadership of Gandhi ji -as to how they reacted and countered the demand of Muslim League for creation of Pakistan. To achieve this end Muslim League had called for direct action resulting in the killing of thousands of innocent Hindus and kidnapping of hundreds of Hindu women specially in Bengal and Punjab.
Many people say how this could happen when there was vast majority of Hindus in India and with a big Hindu organization of disciplined youth namely the Rastriya Svam Sewak Sangh (RSS) having lakhs of volunteers. These volunteers used to pray in their daily shakhas and pledge for laying down their lives for safety and uplift of Hindus and Hindustan and for establishment of Hindu Rastra in India. Thus Hindus in general had great expectation from the RSS, but it miserably failed to do anything worth the name to safe guard the interest of Hindus. As such the disappointment of Hindus was natural as the RSS had stood as a silent spectator at that time of crises. Till today no convincing explanation has come from the RSS side as to why it was so unmindful at that critical time.
To trace out the reasons for their silence, it is important to know how the RSS was born and what changes came in its leadership from 1925(since its birth). With the arrival of Gandhi ji on India’s political scene in or around 1922, Muslim communalism had started raising its head. After Gandhiji’s support to khilafat agitation, there were Hindu Muslim riots at some places including
5.
Nagpur. So some Hindu leaders of Nagpur viewed that the unity of Hindus alone could ensure their safety. So on 27-9-1925(Vijay Dasmi Day) Dr .Moonje, Dr. Hedgewar, Shri Pranjpai and Bapu Sahib Soni founded a Hindu youth club. Dr. Hedgewar was made its chief. The organization was later on given the name of Rastriya Svam Sewak Sangh - populerly known as RSS. The volunteers were given physical training including marshal art training and lessons about Hindu Rastrabaad. While Veer Savarkar was in internment at Ratnagiri, Dr. Hedgewar went there and had met him. By then, he had already read the book “Hindutva” written by Veer Savarkar. Dr. Hedgewar highly appreciated the views expressed in the book and said that Veer Savarkar is an ideal person.
Both Savarkar and Hedgewar believed that so long as the Hindu society does not give up blind faith in many out dated rituals, religious practices and traditions, which kept Hindus divided in castes, sub-castes, touchable, untouchables, tribles and non-tribles and does not stand united and organized, India would never be able to take its rightful place.
In 1937 Veer Savarkar was released from his internment and now he could take part in politics also. In that very year, he was elected president of Hindu Mahasbha, of which Dr. Hedgewar was vice-president. The 1937 session of Hindu Mahasbha was held at Karnavati (Ahemdabaad). The speech delivered by Veer Savarkar at the session is commonly known as Hindu Rastra Darshan.
In 1938, Veer Savarkar was for the second time elected as president of Hindu Mahasabha and the session was held at Nagpur. The responsibility of this session was almost entirely shouldered by the RSS volunteers under the leadership of their chief Dr. Hedgewar. Here also Dr. Hedgewar expressed esteem regards for Veer Savarkar. A large procession was taken out covering entire
6.
Nagpur city. At the head of the procession was Shri Bhaurao Devras, a top ranking volunteer of the RSS, rode on an elephant with a Bhagwadwaj(saffron flag) in hand.
The 1939 session of the Hindu Mahasabha was held at Calcutta. For this session also,Veer Savarkar was elected as its president for the 3rd consecutive year. Those who attended the 1939 Calcutta session of the Hindu Mahasabha included Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherji, Shri Nirmal Chandra Chaterji, ex judge of Calcutta highcourt, RSS chief Dr. Hedgewar and his associates Shri M.S Golwalkar and Shri Baba Sahib Gatate.
BITTERNESS BETWEEN HINDU MAHASABHA AND RSS
As stated above Veer Savarkar was already elected as its president, but the elections for other office bearers of Hindu Mahasabha were held at the session ground. For the post of office secretary there were three contestants 1. Mahashey Indraprakash, 2. Shri Golwalkar and 3. Jyoti Shankar Dixit. The elections were held and the result was - Mahashey Indraprakash got 80 votes, Shri Golwalkar secured 40 votes and Shri Jyoti Shankar Dixit got only 2 votes. As such Mahashey Indraprakash was declared elected as office secretary of the Hindu Mahasabha.
The defeat of Shri Golwalkar in this party elections annoyed him so much that he and some of his colleagues kept them away from the Hindu Mahasabha.
In June l940 Dr. Hedgewar died and in his place Shri Golwalkar was made the head of RSS.
Soon after taking over as RSS chief Shri Golwalker removed Shri Martandey Rao Jog from the post of Sar Senapati, who was appointed by Dr.Hedgewar for imparting military training to senior RSS volunteers. There by breaking the teeth of his own RSS.
7.
Shri Golwalkar was an orthodax person believing in outdated. religious rituals- so much so that he peformed sharad ceremony, not for his ancestors, but for himself during his lifetime. He wore garlands of Ganda- taveez (perhaps given to him by some saints to save him from evils).
Shri Golwalkar’s Hinduism was slightly different from that of Veer Savarkar and Dr.Hedgewar. Shri Golwalkar did not have that much respect and regards for Veer Savarkar which Dr.Hedgewar had. Dr. Hedgewar had many a times described Veer Savarkar as an ideal person and called him Prata- simraniya(A noble person to be remembered with respect every morning).
Infact Shri Golwalkar was not robust enough. He was timid and immature person to head such a big organization which had in 1940 about 4lakhs volunteers and in 1946 strength of about seven lakhs volunteers.
Soon after Golwalkar taking over as chief of RSS the relations between the Hindu Mahasabha and RSS went on going tense. So much so that Shri Golwalkar went on criticizing the agitation being carried on by the Hindu Mahasabha and its leader Veer Savarkar for enrolling the Hindu youths in the Indian army (as a part of their policy of militerising Hindudum).Whereas Dr. Hedegwar till his death in 1940 was admiring the agitation. Even Subash Chandra Bose in his boradcast from Singapur radio had praised Veer Savarkar for recruiting Hindu youth in the army. Thus due to indifferent attitude and negative approach of Shri Golwalkar on such vital issues, the relations between the two organization went on deteriorating.
The Congress and Gandhi ji on the one hand had suggested to the British to handover powers to the Muslim League before quiting India, they were relentlessly propagating that Veer Savarkar and Hindu Mahasabha were communal. The RSS too (after Dr.
8.
Hedgewar’s death)under the leadership of Shri Golwalkar had started a hatred compagin against Veer Savarkar and Hindu Mahasabha. As per Shri Gangadhar Indulkar, an Ex-RSS leader, Shri Golwalkar was doing so because of the growing popularity of Veer Savarkar amongst youths especialy in Maharashtra. Shri Golwalkar was fearful that if the popularity of Veer Savarkar went on growing, the youth would be attracted towards him and will disassociate them from the RSS. Shri Indulkar, while narrating all this asks, whether by doing so, the RSS had done sanghathan or vighatan of Hindus (unity or rift).
while the Congress and the RSS might not have been very successful in marring the shining image of Veer Savarkar, they were to a great extent successful in keeping many Hindus away from the Hindu Mahasabha.
The basic idealogical change in RSS after Dr. Hedgewar’s death in 1940, is evident from the fact that while during Hedgewar’s time Veer Savarkar (not Gandhi ji ) was named as RSS Prata Simraniya, while it was during Golwalkar’s period that the name of Gandhi ji was inducted in the list of RSS Prata Simraniya(it means a noble person, who should be remembered with respect every morning).
In 1946 the election for Central Legislative Assembly of India were held. While Congress contested almost all Hindu and Muslim seats. The Muslim League contested on Muslim seats. Where as Hindu Mahasabha filed nomination for some Hindu seats. Amongst the persons who filed nomination papers as Hindu Mahasabha candidates were some young volunteers of RSS like Baba Sahib Gatate and others. But after the date of filling nomination papers had elapsed, Shri Golwalkar directed those RSS volunteers to withdraw from the elections. Since the date of filling nomination papers had already elapsed, no other person could file
9.
nomination in their place. In such a tense atmosphere withdrawal of some candidates from fighting elections would have naturally. upset the party and marred its prospects in the elections. That was exactly what happened with the Hindu Mahasabha.
The Congress won all the 57 Hindu seats and Muslim League 30 Muslim seats. Infact Shri Golwalkar had indirectly helped Congress in those elections.
With these result of elections, the British had enough evidence to hold that Congress represented the entire Hindu population of India and the Muslim League represented the Muslim population. As such British called meeting of Congress and Muslim League to consider the demand of Pakistan before they quit India. Hindu Mahasaba was not invited for the meetings.
While meetings were going on, there were riots all over India especially in Bengal and Punjab in which thousands of Hindus were killed and lakhs of Hindus left their homes in Muslim dominated areas. That was being done by Muslim league and its Muslim national guards obviously with a view to terrorize the Hindus and compel Gandhi ji and Congress to concede to its demand for Pakistan.
The meetings between Britain, Congress and Muslim League were held at shimla in the months of June and July 1947. At last on 3rd July 1947, they agreed to a formula by which India was to be partitioned and Pakistan was to come in existence on 14-08-1947. The formula was approved by the Congress Commitee including Gandhi ji. As a result of this formula which is known as Mount-bettin formula, India was partitioned and Pakistan formed on 14-08-1947.
The RSS during this period was sitting as a silent spectator. Was it not a betrayal? Till today no convincing reason has been given
10.
by the RSS for their unmindful attitude on such important issue and at such critical juncture. As such one can ask the volunteers of .the RSS as to what RSS did for the safety of Hindus and for keeping India united and what happened to their daily prayer pledging to give sacrifices of their lives for strengthening Hindu nation and Hindustan.
Obviously it was due to the timid and unmatured leader Shri Golwalkar, who became the chief of the RSS after the death of Dr. Hedgewar.
The RSS having a strength about 7 lakhs young volunteers in 1946 neither took any step on its own to counter the direct action call of Muslim league and its Muslim National Guard and its demand for Pakistan. Nor did RSS cooperate with Veer Savarkar and his party Hindu Mahasabha in their efforts for the safety of Hindus and for keeping India united. At some places where Hindu Mahasabha had some strength its workers did give a befitting reply to Muslim National Guard workers of Muslim League. The number of such incidents was of course small.
In Oct. 1944 Veer Savarkar called a meeting of all Hindu parties (political and non-political) and some prominent Hindu leaders, as to how to meet the challenge of Muslim League and to counter its demands. This meeting held at New Delhi was presided over by Shri Radha Mukand Mukherji and was attended to by Shri Shankracharya of Puri, Master Tarasingh, Sir Joginder Singh, Dr.Khare and Jamuna Das Mehta. But the RSS did not attend such an important meeting. Even after the partition of India the RSS did not cooperate with the Hindu Mahasabha in its struggle for Vishva Nath Mandir, Varanasi, agitiation for Comman Civil Law and agitation against Kutub-Minar (which was originally an astrological Lab. and a part of Vishnu Temple). That being so - One asks, whether RSS is a “Sanghathan for Sanghathan only”.
11.
Such an apathetic attitude by the RSS leadership is astonishing and painful.
As such not only Gandhi ji and Congress are responsible for the partition of India but the RSS and its leader Shri Golwalkar are also responsible for the sufferings of Hindus and division of our Motherland.
The history will tell that only Veer Savarkar and Hindu Mahasabha were consistently fighting for Hindu cause but because of indifferent attitude of large number of Hindus, and RSS they could not be successful in their efforts to put an end to the Muslim Leagues’s demand for Pakistan.
So Pakistan, a perpetual danger and headache for India came into being on 14-08-1947 (The Black Day for Hindus and Hindustan).
t.d. chandna
March 23rd, 2011 17:17
“A very important factor which is making it almost impossible for Hindu-Muslim unity to become an accomplished fact is that the Muslim can not confine their patriotism to any one country. I had frankly asked the Muslims whether in the event of any Mohammedan power invading India, would they (Muslims) stand side by side with their Hindu neighbors to defend their common land or join the invaders. I was not satisfied with the reply I have obtained from them….. Even such a man as Mr. Mohammed Ali (one of the famous Ali brothers, the leaders of the Khilafat Movement) has declared that under no circumstances it is permissible for any Mohammedan, whatever be his country, to stand against any Mohammedan”.Rabindranath Tagore, Interview for Times of India, April 18, 1924]
March 23rd, 2011 17:18
It is, therefore, evident that the Islamic scriptures that divide the humanity into believers and non-believers (kafirs) and propagates hatred towards the kafirs is incapable of producing lasting good for the entire humanity. But it is really a pity that the converted Muslims of the subcontinent, whose forefather were forced to embrace the violent cult of Muhammad at the point of sword, detest their true root: the nonviolent, humane and tolerant creed and civilization of Hindustan. This has been causing much misery, suffering and cruelty to numberless innocent people in this lands of historical tranquility, peace and tolerance. A creed, forced upon a people by the sword cannot create, a peaceful society: Muslims of the subcontinent are a glaring proof of that. The sooner they abandon it, the better is it for them and their neighbours.[Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari]
March 23rd, 2011 17:18
About 7/8 years ago in India, there was a proposal on how to bring muslims back to their roots; the first step suggested was that muslims of the Indian subcontinent could be declared ‘Mohammedan Hindus’… as a member of this group, they could slowly begin to severe their links with Islam; thereafter, as their spiritual and meditative knowledge deepened, they could be absorbed into the various Hindu groups dealing with karma-yoga, gyan-yoga and bhakti-yoga, etc. An alternative quicker way is to become a member of ISKCON or of any one of the numerous ‘vaishnava’ societies. This would not only cleanse the muslims of the cruelities and insanity of Islam but would also facilitate their homecoming into true Indian, vedic culture.
March 23rd, 2011 17:19
“one of the most painful aspects of Muslim demographic warfare is the open attempt by Muslims to grab non-Muslim girls to use them for their own demographic ambitions, meanwhile also inflicting a good dose of humiliation on the accursed kafirs. In Bangladesh and in Muslim-majority areas inside India, this often takes the form of simply kidnapping girls, or of threatening their families to marry them out to Muslims? In the open market-place of the West and of westernized circles in India, it takes the form of normal courtship”- Mr. Elst Still if these silly Hindu filmmakers think that they are actually building ‘secular bridges’ by giving Muslim man riding Hindu woman, (the Muslims, of course, won’t allow the reverse.) then they are in error. They fail to understand Islamic mindset. Even if you make all the Muslims in India superstars, in Pakistan this will not be accepted for as a sign of Hindu benevolence or even a gesture of genuine secularism but as an explicit evidence of Hindu inferiority and Islamic superiority! Such is their contempt for all things Hindu. And it does not stop there; Abu Salem (killed Gulshan Kumar, organized Bombay Bomb blasts on more than one occasions even opened gun-fire at the shooting of Hindu religious epic Mahabharta) has managed to get much for Islam. The popularity of “khan” series of Bollywood masala flicks has led to a deadly trait of more and more Hindu girls in western countries (mostly U.K.), misusing the freedom their religion gives them, finding it ‘cool’ and ‘okay’ to marry a Muslim. This is also helped by the cultural vacuum left by Hindu parents who are so secular that they feel ashamed to give their child any knowledge about the great heritage of Hinduism. Zakat (petro-dollars) come all the way from rich Islamic states in gulf to reward the Muslim boys who bring more and more girls to the fold of Islam. Some Muslim boys have even made this “campus-jehad” a full time occupation! And of course for such gullible Hindu girls life is one-way street, once she enters Islam (hoping the warm embrace of her future in-laws who should be grateful to her for leaving her very own parents and religion) she discovers there is nothing warm in the embrace of Islam she embraced as promised in the film that inspired her for this foolish emotional death-dive, but by then it is too late. She is done for. She will probably spend the rest of her cursed life cooking stinking halaal meat and giving birth to a new generation of suicide bombers.
March 23rd, 2011 17:20
Bishop Caldwell had termed the Maravars as goblins of Ravana. ( there is full book in scribd available in google on Tamil and the Dravidian version, where this reference is). His conclusions were based on Silapathikaram story. But after the 10th century when the Raya dynasty came the Maravars assimilated with the Poligars and became a refined community. Then they were soldiers in Nayakar kings of Madurai and southern Tamil Nadu. The were called Thevars later and were the greatest freedom fighters starting from Puli Thevar to Pasumpon Thevar, who joined Subash Bose’s great efforts. The stereotyping of Caldwell is still felt in TN for Thevars who are shown as violent persons ( goblins of Ravana, a Caldwell term) in Tamil films Such is the influence of a colonial master , that the elite in TN still follow to the hilt.
March 23rd, 2011 17:21
Jihad Has Come to India By Richard L. Benkin Jihad has come to India. The Obama administration and the State Department will tell you that it is nothing more than isolated acts by individuals. The government in New Delhi will say you are stirring up anti-Muslim sentiment. The mainstream media will ask how you can say that when we are hearing nothing about it from them. But it is real, and it is happening now. I have seen it first-hand. The Obama administration’s studied denial will find us caught as flat-footed in India as we were in Lebanon, Egypt, Libya, and elsewhere. The difference is that India is an economic and military giant, with nuclear weapons, and could be a cornerstone of any effective fight against radical Islam. For several years, I have been talking about the progressive radicalization of Bangladesh. Although it is the only country that ranks among the ten most populous and the ten most densely populated, as well as being the second largest Muslim-majority nation, events there do not capture people’s imagination. When you talk about India in the same context, however, people take notice. The thought of an Islamist dominated India scares the heck out of them and should. While our own strategic thinkers concentrate on internecine struggles in the Middle East, their obliviousness to the significance of an Islamist India has enabled our enemies to further their agenda. I have spent several years along India’s 2545 mile-long frontier with Bangladesh, and have seen the impact Bangladesh’s radicalization has had on its giant neighbor to the west. Amitabh Tripathi, who has been fighting against what he calls his country’s “soft policies,” noted that Bangladesh’s Muslims “are not radicalized but their institutions are.” That radicalization and a level of corruption on both sides of the border that makes my fellow Chicagoans look like amateurs has already produced demographic change in many strategic areas of India. It also has given Muslim activists carte blanche throughout the entire country. The process is deliberate, has been going on for decades, and should send us a screaming warning signal, not only because of what it bodes for India, but also because of what sort of future the Obama administration’s soft policies and tolerance for an open border to our south mean for the United States. Each year in districts like Uttar Dinajpur and North and South 24 Parganas directly across from the Islamic state, my colleagues and I find that more and more villages which once had mixed Hindu-Muslim populations are now all Muslim or Muslim-dominated. Gone are the roadside temples characteristic of places where Hindus practice their faith openly; gone are the sights of Hindu women dressed in their colorful saris and other vestments. They have been replaced by mosques and burqas. Last year, Tripathi and I met with Bimal Praminik, Director of the Kolkata-based Centre for Research in Indo-Bangladesh Relations and arguably the foremost authority on these population changes. He is convinced that this population shift is a deliberate and an integral element the jihad that threatens all of us: “Bangladeshi infiltration with Pakistani ideas… trying to ‘Pakistanize’ the entire region,” he said adding that that the dominant culture for South Asian Muslims has become more “Arabic,” than South Asian. In 1947 when the British left, they partitioned the Indian subcontinent into Hindu and Muslim states. West Bengal went to Hindu India, and East Bengal (now Bangladesh) became part of Pakistan. While Hindu and Muslim majorities respectively, remain, exhaustive studies by Pramanik and others hold out little hope that things will continue that way. During the second half of the 20th century, the Muslim proportion of West Bengal’s population rose by 25 percent and its Hindu population declined by nine, a process that has continued into the 21st. At the same time, Bangladesh’s Hindu population dropped from almost a third to nine percent. The process has not been pretty and has involved murder, gang rape, abduction of women and children, forced conversion to Islam, and legalized thievery of ancestral Hindu lands under Bangladesh’s anti-Hindu Vested Property Act. And now it is happening in India. Between 1981 and 1991, Muslim population growth in West Bengal actually exceeded its growth in Bangladesh. The South Asia Research Society concluded that Hindus have been fleeing Islamist persecution in East Bengal since the partition; but that since Bangladesh’s emergence as an independent nation in 1971, “there has been large scale voluntary infiltration of Bangladeshi Muslims…to West Bengal and other parts of India” as well. The actual Muslim population growth exceeded Indian government projections that were based on demographic factors (fertility and mortality), internal migration, and the influx of Hindu refugees; thus, there had to be another element driving the change. Pramanik identifies it as “illegal immigration from across the border.” Islamist plans have been so detailed and longstanding that since 1951 the Muslim growth rate exceeded that of Hindus in each individual district of West Bengal. Statistics might be the “smoking gun,” but jihad’s impact is far more powerful in the testimony of individual non-Muslim residents who are its victims. One elderly woman in the Howrah district told us how Muslims are taking over her property piece by piece. She even showed us a wall with a star and crescent on it that local Muslims built to identify it as dar al Islam. In another village, residents showed us the remains of a Hindu temple that Muslims recently destroyed after urinating on its holy objects. Most poignant was the testimony of a crestfallen mother whose 22-year-old daughter was abducted weeks ago by local Muslims. Abduction of Hindu women and girls in the name of Islam has been common in Bangladesh for years and is a key element in jihad: eliminating females of childbearing years from the gene pool and forcing them to “produce” Muslim offspring instead. It is now happening in India, according to victimized parents who told me about it in India’s North and Northeast. Residents of Deganga, only 40 kilometers from the West Bengal capital of Kolkata, lived through an anti-Hindu pogrom last September. The pogrom started — as these things are wont to do these days — with a fabricated land dispute in which Muslims claimed a wooded area off the region’s main road that Hindus own and on which sits a Hindu shrine that is considered very sacred. As the 2010 Islamic observance of Iftar came to an end, a large group of Muslims attempted to seize the land until local Hindus stopped them. It was then that they started attacking Hindu households and shops indiscriminately, forcing many to flee the area with little more than the clothes on their backs. I returned to Deganga last month to find that while many homes and shops have been rebuilt, a sense of security by Hindus in their ancestral land has not. Most of the residents spoke about leaving the area; others talked about being fearful of attack, their children unable to attend school, and Hindu women being harassed whenever they go to the market or other places in the area. Many of them showed us charred pieces of their former residences; in other cases we were able to see signs of it bleeding through a new coat of paint. Hindu women and girls showed us where they hid during the attack to avoid being raped or abducted and made concubines; a fate that likely has befallen the missing 22-year old daughter of the mother above. In every single one of these cases, local authorities have refused to take action. In fact, during the Deganga pogrom, they arrested the community’s wealthiest Hindu on the false charge of firing on the jihadis. In the past, this official inaction has been purchased; but it is also a product of the alliance between Islamists and Communists in India. That alliance was announced publicly at a meeting in the south Indian state of Kerala; and it has been policy for West Bengal’s three-decade old communist government. Wherever we spoke with these villagers, Muslim neighbors would gather menacingly in an attempt to intimidate our informants. In some cases, they attacked after we left — again with no action by the authorities. In Meerut northeast of New Delhi and far from Deganga, the population of this once Hindu-dominated town is now split down the middle between Hindus and Muslims; and the Hindus are living in fear. Just five days ago before my arrival, a Hindu was burned to death and shortly before that a community leader was targeted and killed. These actions are becoming more common in this substantial-sized town with no police re-action; and according to residents and activists, it is only a matter of time before things explode. Our State Department will tell you that there is no jihad in India. They will hew the official line that the liberal Awami League government in Bangladesh has put an end to anti-Hindu actions there. A similarly weak government in New Delhi will parrot the same platitudes. Yet, their false palliatives bring no comfort to the scores of victims who have told us their stories; or the many others now unable to do so. They cannot explain away major terrorist attacks in India’s largest cities like Mumbai, Pune, in New Delhi, and elsewhere. They cannot explain how insurgents can regularly kidnap minor officials and receive their ransom (usually release of prisoners, cash, and government forbearance from counter terrorist action) every time they do. If the Obama administration and its left-wing counterparts in India do not replace their studied ignorance with effective action, we will be as “surprised” over what becomes of India as we were with Iran, Egypt, and a host of other nations